Straight away let me just say I did not hate this movie. In fact I wouldn’t even say this movie sucked, now don’t be confused this movie was not good, not at all, but it was also not all bad there were definitely a couple of things here that made me go, o.k. that didn’t suck. But they were very few and very far in between.
It would not be a difficult task to fill this review with all things wrong with Jumper, because is a sizable list to choose from, instead I will describe the few elements of this movie I did enjoy and try to avoid the temptation of just giving this movie the kick in the pants it deserves.
First you can never go wrong with casting Mr. Sam Jackson. I love Sam because he is never bad even in bad movies and Sam has been in some bad movies. I can’t really tell if I am ok with blonde haired Sam, who am I kidding, I am ok with whatever Sam does. Outside of same none of the other actors do much. I don’t really need to say anything about Christiansen so I won’t. But even Rachel Bilson, as cute as she is, added zero to this movie.
I am also a fan of the action sequences in the film, visually the “jumping” came across very strong I think, particularly in the fight scenes between the jumpers and paladins, group of hunters dedicated to killing all jumpers. The visual effects were very slick and the quick cuts did not annoy has they usually do in movies.
Lastly I have to say I did not hate the story. The script itself fell way short, way short, but the idea of a genetic anomaly or mutation that has been around for centuries and it gives a very small percentage of humans the ability to teleport back to anyplace that have been already is very cool. However as I said the script fell on its face. In the end this movie got kicked out of the summer rotation, but the studio realized they didn’t there was not much of a movie here.
GRADE - D-
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
In Bruges
Finally 2008 has given me a movie that doesn’t make me throw-up in my mouth. Not only does In Bruges not suck, but it is actually a good movie. In Bruges is the story of a promising young hit man, Ray (Colin Ferrell), who makes a costly mistake during one of his jobs and has to hide out “in Bruges”, Belgium while things calm down back in London. While in Bruges Ray with the help of his partner Ken (Brenda Gleason), a veteran of the cleaning business, tries to come to grips with what he as done amongst the beautifully yet incredibly boring back drop of a town where not much happens. Doing his best to stave off insanity from the tremendous boredom Ray ends up falling for a young woman, Chloe (Clemence Posey) working for a film company that is making a movie in Bruges. In the midst of movies, midgets and monotony Ray grapples with life, death and the purpose of existence. You know - simple stuff.
I was not sure if Collin still had anything left in his “acting” tank. After a series of mediocre performances Ferrell has once again joined the ranks of the promising young actors who paint a very nice picture for the future of film making. Ferrell does a nice job of communicating the angst that Ray feels after having done what he did, albeit accidentally, yet it does not undo what has been done. At the same time Ray is a hit man and hit men don’t cry or grapple with life and death, they kill and that’s it. Ferrell is not alone in giving a strong performance, to his right and left stand Ralf Fiennes and Brendan Gleason, both are stand-out actors who continue to deliver. There is a scene at the end between the two veterans that is the stuff of great movie making.
Regarding the guts of the movies, script, filming, sets, etc. I found myself not totally impressed by Bruges, although it is not difficult to see why a film maker would be drawn to such a place, just not my cup of tea. Regarding script, the story is very strong, I love the idea of a young hit man just starting out being confronted with something so terrible his first time on the job that he questions everything.
GRADE – A-
I was not sure if Collin still had anything left in his “acting” tank. After a series of mediocre performances Ferrell has once again joined the ranks of the promising young actors who paint a very nice picture for the future of film making. Ferrell does a nice job of communicating the angst that Ray feels after having done what he did, albeit accidentally, yet it does not undo what has been done. At the same time Ray is a hit man and hit men don’t cry or grapple with life and death, they kill and that’s it. Ferrell is not alone in giving a strong performance, to his right and left stand Ralf Fiennes and Brendan Gleason, both are stand-out actors who continue to deliver. There is a scene at the end between the two veterans that is the stuff of great movie making.
Regarding the guts of the movies, script, filming, sets, etc. I found myself not totally impressed by Bruges, although it is not difficult to see why a film maker would be drawn to such a place, just not my cup of tea. Regarding script, the story is very strong, I love the idea of a young hit man just starting out being confronted with something so terrible his first time on the job that he questions everything.
GRADE – A-
Rambo
Yeah that's right Sly made another one. He has to be done now though, right. I am he can't possibly do another one of these can he. Just when you thought a franchise was dead and buried it comes back 20 years later to remind you somethings should stay dead. Rambo, the fourth installment of the franchise stars Sly Stallone reprising his role as title character who shares the movie title’s name. After surviving Rocky’s return to the big screen Sly felt that there was a place for a little Rambo love as well. Let me tell you there really isn’t. I mean I like bodies hitting the floor as much as the next guy and I am certainly not squeamish about blood and guts, but there comes a point where it doesn’t matter how many explosions and action sequences there are if at the center of them is a guy that can’t even go shirtless anymore because he just doesn’t have the goods the way he used to.
Sly you look great bro, you really do, if I am blessed with your body at 50 I would be psyched, but know thyself my friend, you are no longer an action movie star. And Sly is not the only thing wrong with this movie, I am talk about an empty script, this is classic reluctant hero is drawn into conflict because would be love interest is in danger. A group of mercenaries need an escort into the deepest most dangerous parts of the jungle and Rambo is the only one around. It is not long before our hero is obliterating an entire battalion of Burmese soldiers.
Aside from some spectacular death sequences and a lot of shooting and stuff going boom, there is nothing else here. It didn’t suck, no it didn’t, but this has got to be it, no more reprising roles that made you famous, nostalgia is overrated.
GRADE - D
Sly you look great bro, you really do, if I am blessed with your body at 50 I would be psyched, but know thyself my friend, you are no longer an action movie star. And Sly is not the only thing wrong with this movie, I am talk about an empty script, this is classic reluctant hero is drawn into conflict because would be love interest is in danger. A group of mercenaries need an escort into the deepest most dangerous parts of the jungle and Rambo is the only one around. It is not long before our hero is obliterating an entire battalion of Burmese soldiers.
Aside from some spectacular death sequences and a lot of shooting and stuff going boom, there is nothing else here. It didn’t suck, no it didn’t, but this has got to be it, no more reprising roles that made you famous, nostalgia is overrated.
GRADE - D
Now is as a good a time as any
It has been 2008 for more than four months and yes I have seen a number of movies so far this year, but with the writer's strike and the arrival of my new 360 I have not been movtivated to put pen to paper or fingers to keyboard and start working on my reviews for this year. Well my buddy C Barone, http://www.baroneatthecinema.blogspot.com/, got cracking on his reviews and has inspired me to get going on mine. Needless to say I have to get moving becuase the summer movie season is nearly upon us and if I waited any longer I could creat a serious back-log of reviews and nobody wants that.
With a year of reviews in the bag I am excited about my second year as a "blogger". This year you can look forward to the same great entertaining writing that you got last year. I will make more of an effort to edit before posting, but no promises. I also will try to wrap up my Van Damme project and move on to Steve Segal this year. Look for some newer enhancements to the reviews and always expect the unexpected. Thanks for checking me dear reader as we embark on one more year of Botts at the Cinema.
With a year of reviews in the bag I am excited about my second year as a "blogger". This year you can look forward to the same great entertaining writing that you got last year. I will make more of an effort to edit before posting, but no promises. I also will try to wrap up my Van Damme project and move on to Steve Segal this year. Look for some newer enhancements to the reviews and always expect the unexpected. Thanks for checking me dear reader as we embark on one more year of Botts at the Cinema.
Cloverfield
JJ Abrams, producer of two of T.V.'s biggest hits, Lost and Alias, jumps onto the big screen with a horror/sci-fi thriller, that was marketed to be 2008's first big hit. Well JJ let's be grateful that you are really good at putting the pieces together to make really good TV, because if Cloverfield is any indication of what is to come from you in the movie industry - I'll pass.
Cloverfield was an attempt to combine the hand-held camera recording style introduced in Blair Witch Project and digital recording to make the film feel more intense and authentic. From strickly a film making point of view the movie did have some success in that regard. There were at least three scenes in the movie that really worked because of the hand held affect; the train tunnel scene and the two apartment scenes (the first one at party and the second to find his girl friend). However outside of those two scenes I felt like it was limiting and prevented the audience from getting a full picture of what was happening. I am sure that was the intent and thereby add to the authencity, but I found it annoying.
Regarding the story, it was shallow and full of holes. Perhaps we have reached a place in our civilization where so many movies have been made about government conspiracies and cover ups and experiments gone wrong, etc. but I would appreciate at least some lips service being paid to try explain why a random huge monster is ravaging Manhattan. We got no explanation of where the monster came from nor did we get any clue as to who knew what about it. Again I understand that the story being told was about this group of friends and how they are simply trying to survive this encounter. So we only know what they know, which would go to my early point that is shallow story telling.
In the end the movie had a couple of moments here and there, but for the most part did not deliver and ultimately was a dissapointment.
GRADE - D
Cloverfield was an attempt to combine the hand-held camera recording style introduced in Blair Witch Project and digital recording to make the film feel more intense and authentic. From strickly a film making point of view the movie did have some success in that regard. There were at least three scenes in the movie that really worked because of the hand held affect; the train tunnel scene and the two apartment scenes (the first one at party and the second to find his girl friend). However outside of those two scenes I felt like it was limiting and prevented the audience from getting a full picture of what was happening. I am sure that was the intent and thereby add to the authencity, but I found it annoying.
Regarding the story, it was shallow and full of holes. Perhaps we have reached a place in our civilization where so many movies have been made about government conspiracies and cover ups and experiments gone wrong, etc. but I would appreciate at least some lips service being paid to try explain why a random huge monster is ravaging Manhattan. We got no explanation of where the monster came from nor did we get any clue as to who knew what about it. Again I understand that the story being told was about this group of friends and how they are simply trying to survive this encounter. So we only know what they know, which would go to my early point that is shallow story telling.
In the end the movie had a couple of moments here and there, but for the most part did not deliver and ultimately was a dissapointment.
GRADE - D
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
